Thursday, January 26, 2012

You & Yer Fancy Book Lernin', Nuts To That



The pointless water-fluoridation debate continues apace in London, Ontario. Last night the civics works committee heard from a variety of people on the benefits, and horrors, of water-fluoridation. Anyone who has followed this exhausting non-issue for the last twenty-years could have told you how it was going to play out, but I'll let the reporters tell you:  

Earlier in the evening, tempers flared during the presentation by Dr. Bryna Warshawsky of the Middlesex-London Health Unit. When she said it was safe to use fluoridated water to mix baby formula, a man yelled "that's not true." Coun. Stephen Orser, who has recently become convinced of fluoride's risks, was clear in his challenging of presentations by Warshawsky and Peter Cooney, Health Canada's chief dental officer. Much of the crowd was clearly opposed to fluoride. People cheered whenever someone offered even a hint of an anti-fluoride statement.

Not surprisingly, when rational thought and scientific consensus is on the table, experts are booed and jeered by the crowd, and challenged by Stephen Orser. Fucking genius Stephen, with his shiny new Google M.D., is now convinced that years and years and years of studies about water fluoridation, and it's efficacy, are wrong. Like the anti-wind turbine folks, the wifi-is-evil crowd, the goddamn-Bilderburgers-are-controlling-us-all group, and the LARPers (fucking LARPers), these groups attribute all kinds of evils to their pet chimera. In this case, the daughter of Typhon is fluoride, which like Bill Clinton's penis, is the most powerful force in the universe. There is no evil it cannot inflict upon you once you are under its sway.
Fluoridation is safe and effective for preventing tooth decay.

From the CDC, "Scientists have found a lack of evidence to show an association between water fluoridation and a negative impact on people, plants, or animals.”

The Canadian Dental Association, the American Dental Association, the CDC, The Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water; these groups are not made up of evil people. They are not poisoning you for some nefarious purpose. The overwhelming weight of evidence supports water fluoridation as a public good. Groups of engineers and concerned homeopaths cannot be held in equal regard when they rage against fluoridation. We have to, at some point, defer to the consensus opinion of experts, or nothing can get done and no public good can result in any facet of our lives. There are groups and studies pro and con EVERYTHING. They cannot be held in equal regard at all times. "He said, she said" is not the way to do public policy. We simply must stop arguing at some point and get on with doing the right thing. When the weight of evidence against water-fluoridation even remotely approaches the evidence for, then we should take a look at it. As it stands, it does not. 


7 comments:

  1. How dare you bring logic and reason to a bum-fight? You'll never get elected that way. Never!

    But I'll diverge on the wind-farm debate. I'm open to the possibility that low-level frequencies *may* have an impact on human health. My theory is that it can generate a stress-response in some people and this, in turn, has a health impact. And that's why I hate that fucking teenager 2 blocks over that aims his sub-woofer at my backyard on Summer nights. Good report here.

    Oh, and fuck LARPers.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "I'm open to the possibility"

    And there's the key point. I am open to anything that can be proven, or shown to be reasonable with sufficient evidence. As with the report you referenced, it may be annoying, but it hasn't proven to be unhealthy.

    As someone with a neighbour who enjoys his rock and roll, I concur on the stress effects of unwanted noise. If only there was public policy I was willing to use to my benefit. I'll just stew instead.

    ReplyDelete
  3. J. Fugle3:47 PM

    PREACH!

    ReplyDelete
  4. We are going through the same process out West and the "natural lifestyle" crowd are out in force.
    Precious bodily fluids and all that.
    If only they would divest themselves of all the advances that modern sciences have given us in an act that is at least consistent in approach.
    But
    http://i.imgur.com/gxPlq.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  5. You science-types . . . with your big words and desire to continue the corporate agenda.

    . . . I've got one hyphenated word for you guys, chem-trails . . . .

    I'm keeping my eye on you Dandy.

    PS. I also won't be brushing my teeth anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Harebell,

    Do you think the holistic hippies are now going to push to have chlorine treatments stopped? Chlorine is a deadly chemical just like sodium fluoride, and shouldn't our bodies be allowed to naturally filter our water through our livers and kidneys? It just makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
  7. SHFS,

    It's like you are begging me to listen to more Gary Bell. Be mindful of which song you request, I will play the tune!

    That sounded much more ominous in my head.

    May I suggest one of these as an alternate water source to aid in your oral hygiene?

    ReplyDelete